Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency
by
birdonthewire
on 14/11/2020, 17:42:14 UTC
If technically possible, I prefer a "non-friendly" fork that prioritizes the maximum possible optimization of the potential of DASH, of the collective project as a whole.

Impressive, two weeks on this Dash forum and already all-in for a Dash hard fork. A 'non-friendly' Dash hard fork at that. Bound to split and divide this Dash community.
Well, that is one bird flying very fast  Shocked

Nor do I see DCG as essential at this crossroads, perhaps it can assume a certain continuity or conservatism based on its current role in the DASH hierarchy
Why am i not surprised ? Sure, lets just bypass DCG altogether.

Good luck with all that.
 

I do not know why you are surprised, with two minutes you can already release a wide sample of tricks designed to censor, disavow and troll the rest.

Anyway, you have a serious identification problem: You associate a nick in this forum with a history in DASH. The same dyslexia of associating 5000 Mnodes with a decentralization at 5000 points. Who will consider after the nonsense consequences of that perspective?

Finally, between not considering DCG indispensable for a fork to ignoring it completely, there is the same distance as between the logical interpretation of a message and your tortuous deformation, generating another of your own harvest ... modus operandi that you make more than clear in a couple of messages, with whoever it is. Because, coincidentally, I am only the last of those who have posted in recent days whose judgments you are trying to overrule. That's also very characteristic of the DASH hierarchy ... on its worst side, I mean.

Well ... that censorious attitude from privileged positions embedded in a centralized hierarchy is one of the causes that most limits, corrupts and projects a lousy image of a project that should be pure gold in the eyes of the sector ... so doubtfully Productive changes could be addressed with a friendly fork of those who increasingly concentrate the beneficiary population of the project (Today, the miners ... tomorrow, who knows?). Of course, looking after the reasons why "Saint Market" does not digest DASH Stock to Flow due to minor nuances, dismissing obvious structural defects is really "consequential". Of your "characteristic" logic, of course.

Anyway ... surely anyone who reads us will have an idea of ​​their own. They may even be able to think without the help of your "translations".

A greeting.