I think you'll find from my summary it's OG who initiated resolving the trust issue I had with him. In this scenario it's OG who was the "bigger man", not me. I just reciprocated removing my feedback, as it was the right thing to do.
Well, he was also the "bigger man" who called you a liar and left you negative trust first. He uses negative trust as extortion, which you paid.
If it's not obvious, I'm clearly ignoring past actions, in the spirit of burying the hatchet. I don't feel I was extorted for removing my neutral feedback, as OG removed his negative feedback without expecting anything in return or communicating this to me. I was not obliged to remove my feedback, it was a choice, hence big difference.
What matters to me more is how others act in the present, not mistakes they might of made in the past that have since been rectified. Similar to me distrusting you from trust list Day 1 for doxxing OG, sometimes it's better to forgive and move on. This is probably where we differ in opinions more than anything.