So while I'm not exactly happy to see such a wanton moneygrab being advertised via signature on the forum, at least there is a quality control element that only Hhampuz and a select handful of others can provide.
I agree, and I've also voiced my opinion that the campaign manager shouldn't be held responsible if the project turns out to be a scam. And it's not like this would be the first signature campaign that's advertised something shady--we've had
plenty of that over the years involving a number of campaign managers (or the absence of one in the case of Secondstrade and the first Yobit campaign).
But this is at least a guarantee that participants who take part in this campaign will be paid in full in the first week, and I think this will only run for 1 week according to what Hhampuz said, it's true Hex only buys votes from bitcointalk with high payrates so that it can To divert the issue at issue here, Hex is still controversial in my opinion because it says the Ponzi scheme is right by providing high annual rewards.