I agree with this user. He has nothing to hide. And the story about not showing the evidence is ridiculous.
But, we can always see what the result will be. If he will not get his winnings, then
for sure it is a conspiracy.Ah, I see what you did there. It looks like a setup for a suggestion that if zikzik loses at mediation, then he should open a new Scam Accusation thread against SBR—and I guess, then there would need to be
another Scam Accusation against SBR in KILLYMNE’s name.

What you say is unfalsifiable, and also one-sided. I presume that if SBR rules for zikzik and tells Betcoin.AG to pay, then you will praise the mediation process as absolutely fair—perfect justice! Whereas you have already condemned it in advance, if it goes the other way.
—Tell me, why are you so sure about what you say the outcome should be? I myself am careful to neither predict nor advocate the outcome—because I do not have access to the substantive evidence, and
I have no connection to either of the parties. Do you?I think that Betcoin.AG presents a credible story on this thread; but I would not be surprised, if zikzik wins at mediation. It could go either way, depending on the evidence!
I presume that the mediator is fair and impartial. To allege otherwise would require
evidence.