Re: Reports to the moderator due to political disagreements in the Wall Observer
----
Was it really necessary to make a second post in here? It looks like you are still beating a horse that's already been dead for some days, and by doing so, you're burying some other threads that may be important. At least more important than "I got my post deleted in a thread moderators aren't suppose to act", it was deleted, might have been the right or wrong thing to do, but for the love of god; let it goMaybe more people are annoyed but too afraid to speak up because they will get hit by another spam wall.
It's amazing this has filled 3 pages now.
I remarked that I sometimes find it helpful to read a post without looking at its author’s name. That applies both to good posts, and to things that come off as surprisingly... otherwise.
That's an honorable effort. (And I know something about putting time and effort into posts, including some of those deleted in this instance.)
Well, I think we can agree that posts aren’t deleted by the mods for no reason. Otherwise my reports would have been reported as “bad”. I don’t shitpost. Say what you will—you must admit that all of my posts are highly literate, intelligent, and cultured. You reported my posts, not others’ shitposts. I think that my posts were too good, in a way that you disliked.
Not so sure here. 
"Beating a dead horse" can be considered as shitposting. It's quite amazing how this thread for a generic issue has grown to 3 pages (and probably will grow even more).
Björn Höcke is still a little bit too much of a centrist for me.
If you like Bernd Höcke (as known as Björn Höcke), you’ll like Landolf Ladig even more: https://politicalbeauty.de/landolf/If you like Landolf Ladig even more, you should get some merch!
#getsomemerch
By buying merch, you can show your support effectively. All real supporters are buying merch. If you don’t buy merch, you are not a real supporter, keep that in mind.
All funds collected from merch will go directly to a special purpose to support Landolf Ladig (for example to challenge future election fraud)
But I won't recommend it to buy Landolf Ladig merch because Landolf Ladig (calling himself a strong leader) will just use opportunities as an vehicle to reach his goal.
That would be an existential threat to Bitcoin because Bitcoin is supposed to hold strong leaders accountable.
The most important thing for strong leaders is to be leading strong and Bitcoin is undermining the strength of an leader (as an leaderless digital currency). So votes for Landolf Ladig (or Björn Höcke) would be actually a vote against Bitcoin.
C’mon, One Meow! Cats are supposed to eat birds!
Twitter is for bird-brains.
Believe it or not, Twitter and I have a very awkward relationship, I have several accounts there banned for no reason (in one case I tweeted about some rare flowers and got banned). Twitter is a shit platform, it's totally easy to derail discussions if we can actually call these scraps of conversation "discussions". It's a pity that Twitter is often used by shitcoins which is in fact a large booster of shitcoin fails. Twitter is for bird-brains.Since you have waded through my post history you should have noticed it already.
Reductio ad absurdum, I doubt that 1miau would have reported r0ach’s posts
At least r0ach doesn't post spam walls which would take some time to wade through. We have our very own r0ach (KingScorpio) but unfortunately, his post quality has declined. (It's a pity because some of his posts were actually funny; now it's only incoherent gibberish.