Noone has anything to respond to that?
I did the same verifications and I also found he should have hit 210 on his 2nd roll.
Then I made the maths for my last 22 rolls, and I did find some discrepancies too on several occasions.
How can that be explained?
And what is the server seed hash for? I don't understand how it counts in the calculation of the roll.
The server seed hash is shown before the roll is made because the actual server seed has to be a secret until the roll is completed. When a roll is finished you can prove that they didn't change the server seed to get a favorable result by hashing it to see if it matches the hash they showed you before. It becomes irrelevant since they will still scam you, even if they don't change the server seed, by displaying the wrong result.
come on. there is zero "evidence"

all we have seen are some screenshots that people have concocted to try to show a scam
there is as much reason to believe these screenshots are fraudulent as there are to believe that coinpot is a scam
No amount of evidence will ever be good enough for you. You've made that very clear. No one has to take my word for it. Everybody is free to verify their own results and we have already heard from others who have come to the same conclusion I did after they tested the 'provably fair' formula.
its just not "evidence" because screenshots like this are incredibly easy to fake. it simply does not prove anything.
and its fairly clear by recent comments above that some people have an ulterior motive to continuously try to discredit coinpot
there are thousands of honest people using coinpot successfully (including myself) - so is this "evidence" that coinpot is NOT a scam?
if i posted here a "screenshot" of a coinpot web page with a photo of the queens naked ass on it, is that evidence that they are promoting royal porn?

"Everybody is free to verify their own results"
ive personally done this on a few dozen of my losing rolls and they are all mathematically sound - perhaps im just lucky eh?