****************
A question for you:
****************
The masternode network costs around $100,000 per month to run. So why are we paying $2.1million per month for it ? The wasted $2 million could be spent on attracting competition for the primary supply which would support its price directly and put us back on a near-level playing field with our mined competitors in this respect. Then our "feature advantages" might actually start to matter.
Not only that, it would work EVEN when the masternode count reaches equilibrium whereas the "supply gaming" tactic depends on a growing masternode count.
You are playing a fool here. Going from 2.1 million to 0.1 million is a reduction of approximately 95% in the pay of the masternodes. The current ROI for running a DASH masternode in terms of DASH is 5.65% pa. Under your correction it would become 0.28% all of which would be consumed in hosting fees, would not cover the currency risk a MNO is exposed to, would not cover the oppurtuniy risk, would not cover the cuck risk, the risk of the devs screwing something up etc etc. The net effect of this would be for masternodes to be sold en masse as the network optimises the reward higher to attract/sustain investment. Selling off millions of DASH onto an illiquid market would drop the price into the single digits. You are well aware of this, and your posts hence forth should be considered as trolling since you are an intelligent man and know better.