Here you go again, willfully, misrepresenting what DASH is when you know oh so well what a masternode is and you know it is not the same as the Bitcoin node where I can run one without having to cough up 1000 DASH currently worth about $83K USD.
There are plenty of holders of $83k worth of bitcoin who do so without requiring an "uneconomic profit" to be paid to them out of the blockchain. Nor would they want to if it came at the cost of devaluation of their capital. Dash has no advantage there from simply having coins held in wallets. Its advantage is in being as good a store of value as bitcoin but with an on-chain service layer.
But that service layer should be valued appropriately. If it isn't then the advantage is lost and we simply use the blockchain to pretend that "something is happening" which warrants payment to masternodes.
You are the one who is mis-representing Dash by pretending that capital costs alone represent a basis for masternode revenues and absolve them from generating any economic benefit for the chain. I can understand how masternodes themselves can be deluded by this logic (turkeys/christmas) but outside investors are not.
This is incredible and fascinating...I'm going to prepare long form document on the sheer volume of facetious claims and proposition's you have continued to make with out evidence.
You have now certainly taken the seat of the most dishonest interlocuter I have ever had the misfortune of interacting with.
Every time I've asked for proof of correlation to you hypothesis you have deflected.
DASH is in the 10 of minable coins and in fact is more realistically in the top 5 of minable coins. You are purposefully misrepresenting facts and contorting them to feed your narrative. You have not shown 1 piece of evidence to proof you position.
I dismiss you premise in its entirety.
Please provide evidence...yet again. Your question to me can in now be construed as evidence of you claims. Its irrelevant...
Are you a masternode owner?