Re: Pain of a bounty manager.

There are lots of member busy on catching those who abused the principles at Scam Accusations thread.

Most of those cheaters have been caught and reported on Reputation thread, not scam accusation. Scam accusation is needed when the project turned to scam and ran away with their ICO/IEO/Defi money.

Quote from: Jocuserious on November 14, 2020, 05:34:28 PM

I don't want to blame the bounty manager because a project will be a success or a failure there is nothing for the bounty manager to do.

Managers MUST do some little research first before he accepting the project they want managed. At least, escrow the bounty funds to them or trusted escrower.

In fact, professional manager always do more research on a project. so many times the manager idea is wrong, so there is nothing wrong with the manager. If the ICO/IEO of a project goes to fails then there is no mistake of bounty manager. Also at this time almost all the projects are cheating and scamming where many managers are not willing to manage the bounty at this time.

People needs to understand that the manager of the bounty is not the manager of the project. He is only paid to manage the bounty.
So in case if the bounty project becomes a failure in future, the bounty manager has noting to do with it.

bounty is consider as a project and we can say that managers are managing the project . on a real project, i think its not the managers role to process payments but it was a role for the financial in charge or treasury except maybe on the sig campaigns on this forum because popular managers can process payment and manage the campaign at the same time . on bounty its different because managers are also treated as a bounty hunter and will also get paid once the bounty is over . bounty managers must search for a good project if they do not want that to happen and having an ability to manage a good project makes them iconic