Here it is quantified.

The role of masternodes as "zero difficulty miners" isn't baseless, it's fact.

That this portion of the reward is used to fund a pure profit margin isn't an assumption, it's fact.

That that the mining model uses hashrate to mediate competition for the primary supply and thereby put a price on it isn't an assumption, it's fact. (Even tax authorities see it that way).

The only "assumption" is that is made is that this level of reward ratio is sub-optimal and adversely affects Dash's competitivity. But this assumption isn't baseless. It's exactly what's predicted by the idea that the market simply reprices the uneconomic profit of masternodes. It also explains why our feature superiority has worked in reverse, putting us at such an enormous marketcap deficit compared to competitors which have none of these features. It also completely conflicts with what's argued here about hashrate "not being needed".

So keep posting that these are "not facts" or "baseless" but it would seem to me that that's just chaff because you don't really have any plausable counter arguments.