The most interesting part is that the project was audited for security with 2 companies -- MixBytes and HAECHI, doesn't it mean it's supposed to be secure from external attacks? Something's really fishy in this whole situation...
No, neither of them admitted that this was the result of their audit. LOL
Mixbytes claims they did not audit the part of the contract that was the target of hacking, they only audit other contracts.
Source:
https://twitter.com/MixBytes/status/1330413943148441602HAECHI claims that the contract which is the target of the hack is a new contract that is not subject to the security audit.
Source:
https://twitter.com/haechi_audit/status/1330347468802973698I'm not a coder to ask questions: how the contract that triggers the hack can be said to be not subject to a security audit?
This would put Pickle even more into the corner.