No, this is all talk, a fork to remap 80/20 would cause the coin to flip, moving rewards to masternodes has been shown to increase the value of the coin and vice versa decrease it. This was made clear in Ryan's talk, where in the early days of DASH Evan was pushing the allocation to mnodes which Tok and AFBTC benefited greatly from as it caused the price to go up every time. We recently increased the ratio once more and just the news that we were doing it pushed the price from $ 65 to $ 93 in a matter of weeks and we are still 5 days from the first push.

This pamphlet correlation is an integral fallacy (and by the way ... price increases do not generate stability, much less consolidate a store of value. Whoever talks like this, simply does not understand money - something quite common in crypto - or, worse: wants whoever is paying attention to understand nothing).



For your shared node, search crowdnode.io. Sorry, but shared nodes are stupid and the amount needed for a mode will never be significantly reduced, we don't need minnows running mnodes, they are for people with a lot of money to invest, because it is a high risk company and requires a lot of your attention, The last thing DASH needs is an army of minnows that don't care about DAO because their investment in it is so low.

Crownode? I mean ... to optimize DASH ... run away from DASH! Outside they will do what "your" favorite project doesn't do for you.

So ? The DAO scammed everyone who bought tokens with that perspective, because they committed to it by advertising with their own funds, media AND REFERRAL PEOPLE on DASH to convey that commitment. Even with estimates of dates (of course, unfulfilled - LOL, we are talking about DASH - ... and several still exposed TODAY in DASH strategic official communication points, to continue to confuse interestedly.

Regarding the "people with a lot of money" that YOU want for a high risk investment - according to you - in such a decentralized and transparent DASH, you should inform them that ALL their rights can be revoked by enough vote in a system with enormous risk of centralization ... and that 5000 Mnodes is possibly a few hundred voters only, don't you think? (By the way, it would not be unnecessary to explain that Duffield admitted almost 300 Mnodes ... claiming that 80% would be donated to the DAO - but that nevertheless, there is no news, years later, of that donation - ... and also warn them of that are already beginning to see "unique clicks" that trigger more than 100 votes). Anyway ... tell that to your dear rich people, tell them ... If you think that fucking that high-net-worth gang is going to be the same as scamming humble Mexicans or Argentines who bought your tokens for more than a thousand bucks to create the "paid DASH accounts" that you are boycotting today, you are dreaming about ... or the deceitful censor Valenzuela must be putting his cock on LSD, glutton

Watch your diet, man. 




Also, remember the purpose of a mnode it is to thwat sybil attacks and provide just enough nodes to secure the network and run the services on layer2 without so many that it would delay the propagation of TXes.  5000 nodes is about right, probably with a factor of 2 lee way either side.