i hate arbers as well. Bookmakers wouldn't be so strict if arbers didn't exists.

YET, posts claiming that Adkins acted in good faith confiscating guy's balance, are nonsense.

Most of you have no idea what are the industry standards, doubt you ever gambled as well.

If adkins believe that a user was an arbitrage bettor, industry standards say that they have 2 options:

1) Void bets before kick off (unfair imo but accepted in some way)

                                OR

2) Limit player after the event and protect their asses and pay him in full

According to your logic, every book can void all winners claiming ''arbitrage''.

Adkins should pay poor guy in full and use his example to correct their lines faster, nothing more nothing less.

Unless we speak about wrong displayed odds, the guy should be paid in full.

You should never expect that treatment from bet365 or any other fair bookie, why would you accept it from Adkinsbet