Well he certainly has been leaving some very strange feedback. I wonder why accusations of conspiracies and gangs running this forum are thrown around by people that have run out of actual substance of debate.
Of all the things I thought I would never see in this forum I never thought you would be accused of being involved in some shady business or government honeypot
It could be as simple as: "I've removed the fake signature, please consider removing the negative feedback".
I like seeing my Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system in your signature
Of all the things I thought I would never see in this forum I never thought you would be accused of being involved in some shady business or government honeypot
how about the support of inner circles and shady cartels? will you also comment on this so quick as you did before? 
This seems off-topic (and in need of evidence) to me, so no, I won't comment on it here. But I think you missed my point: if you want to argue against negative feedback, at least use the right arguments.It could be as simple as: "I've removed the fake signature, please consider removing the negative feedback".
I like seeing my Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system in your signature