Are fine artworks in European museums deemed NSFW by forum rules?
A question that I ask because I do strive in good faith to heed the forum rules:
Is the content of websites of famous European museums considered “NSFW” by Bitcointalk.org moderation policy?
Another question: Is my avatar permitted? Although it is exoterically an infinite zero, it has an esoteric meaning that is sexually graphic and explicit.
—Yes, I am serious. I am well-known for double entendre and beyond: Onion-layered multiplicities of meaning. Inter alia, the green oval with a dot of my avatāra has always evoked and invoked the yóni opening to the liṅga at the moment of intromission, in accord with my private study of the kāmaśāstra.*
On another note, I request heavier moderation of rude trolls. Some foul-mouthed lowlife called me a “c—”, and I am deeply offended! Sincerely offended: Courtesy is important to me; and I am in principle against the use of anatomical terms as “dirty words”, on grounds that such usage defiles the cleanliness and sanctity of the human body.
Naturally, what with this being the Internet, and what with my being a mature grown-up, I just rolled with the punches instead of demanding that my feelings be protected. But I admit, my feelings are hurt: I am shocked, outraged, and indignant!
Where is the Bitcointalk.org Trust and Safety Team!?
What with this being a private forum, I will not repost the deleted content without permission. Rather, I do hereby as I promised: I am taking this up in Meta, in an appropriate manner.
However, I will publish in Post #2 a brief excerpt of such deleted content as is—most ironic, and not only relevant, but essential to this discussion.
Is the content of websites of famous European museums considered “NSFW” by Bitcointalk.org moderation policy?
Quote from: https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.php
- Delete reply: Re: Reeeeeeeeee: nullius is a cunt in topic #5293050 by member #976210
- [...]
- Delete reply: Re: Do you want more or less freedom? in topic #5293277 by member #976210
- [...]
- Delete reply: Re: Reeeeeeeeee: nullius is a cunt in topic #5293050 by
Another question: Is my avatar permitted? Although it is exoterically an infinite zero, it has an esoteric meaning that is sexually graphic and explicit.
Quote from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=avatar
It must be safe for work.
—Yes, I am serious. I am well-known for double entendre and beyond: Onion-layered multiplicities of meaning. Inter alia, the green oval with a dot of my avatāra has always evoked and invoked the yóni opening to the liṅga at the moment of intromission, in accord with my private study of the kāmaśāstra.*
I have spent more time studying and practicing kāmaśāstra than science and technology! Now, why don’t you quote that, PM theymos, and ask him to ban me because I like sex, and I am not ashamed of it.
* No, I did not even try to decline all these Sanskrit words tossed into an English sentence. Eh.🤬
On another note, I request heavier moderation of rude trolls. Some foul-mouthed lowlife called me a “c—”, and I am deeply offended! Sincerely offended: Courtesy is important to me; and I am in principle against the use of anatomical terms as “dirty words”, on grounds that such usage defiles the cleanliness and sanctity of the human body.
Naturally, what with this being the Internet, and what with my being a mature grown-up, I just rolled with the punches instead of demanding that my feelings be protected. But I admit, my feelings are hurt: I am shocked, outraged, and indignant!
😭
Where is the Bitcointalk.org Trust and Safety Team!?
What with this being a private forum, I will not repost the deleted content without permission. Rather, I do hereby as I promised: I am taking this up in Meta, in an appropriate manner.
However, I will publish in Post #2 a brief excerpt of such deleted content as is—most ironic, and not only relevant, but essential to this discussion.
— See you next Tuesday. —