Epic #FAIL: Start a topic titled, “Do you want more or less freedom?”—and then enforce the
You're still missing the point, that's an existing rule. If you want to fight it, feel free to open a topic but I don't think the Bitcointalk Administration is going to allow you to posts hairy cunts on the forum without warning.Not Safe For Wife
I already opened my topic—as a question, for I am aghast at the proposition that my posts violated forum rules. And I am not the only one; I have received private comments supporting me on the issue, from people whom I would not expect or ask to stick their necks out over it as I am.
hilarious’ answer was the only official one thus far, and was equivocal.
If it is confirmed unequivocally (directly, or via high-level staff) that the forum’s administration prohibits the deleted posts, then I will retitle the topic from a question to a declaration. And yes, I will argue the case! Harder than you think. This is important to me. theymos is a libertarian (which I am not), so he will probably understand in his own way why I don’t just shrug it off.
Ordinarily, as a gentleman, I would not speak ill of a man’s wife in an Internet argument. But if you want to hide behind her, and she is a classless harridan who disrespects fine art, then she is fair game.
Lol, good luck with that 
Let’s make a deal: You stand up for your own opinion, without suggesting that I must comply with your wife’s sensibilities per a “Not Safe For Wife” rule
; and I will not mention her again in this context. I did not like doing that. It is terribly rude. The politics of personal attacks on men’s wives (and otherwise family) is a despicable trend that started in the 1930s–50s. Very modern. I detest it.Agreed?