Since bounty hunters are being blamed for the projects price drop,
Why not ask the projects owner to pay the bounty reward in BTC or whatever the investors used to invest in their project?
They've promised their hunters a reward that has a total of $ value on their token/coin but they couldn't deliver it.
Wouldn't this kind of payment would solve both the investors and hunters problem?
The project price wouldn't dump after the reward has been given to the hunters and the hunters would get what has been promised to them.
I think the BM's could try and convince their clients for this kind of payment if they give it a try.
I like this suggestion you made here. And it was that way with most projects running signature campaigns in 2017 and a few only running bounties. I do not know how all that changed and projects now all want to run bounties so they can cheat hunters out of their rewards and blame them later when project failed. I want managers to return to the past so that the cheating of hunters and blame can stop.