On the other hand I always had to live side by side with those who call themselves holders, i.e. those who don't take decisions.
Holding and not trading is a decision in itself.
Now, this is the exact opposite of what I think of investing: blindingly relying on something that you cannot control but, for the time being, they are being proved right.
With that argument, investing in businesses through stocks shouldn't be called "investing" in your view?
If it proves right that the real, deep power of bitcoin is scarcity, and that this scarcity will always push its value (and price) higher, IF this is true, what sense does it even make trading bitcoin?
I mean, you could always do it of course, but there's no much relevance about it..
on the other hand a trader could argue: "look at gold. Gold is scarce as well but it's not always rising".
It's not scarcity alone. It's scarcity, while knowing that there will still be future demand for it.
Don't get me wrong, I still hate holders ok, with their mantras, their plan-b and stf shit, butwhat I mean is may be they are right. May be BTC is in that phase where it still pays being herd, the herd of holders..
It's one thing to disagree with the "plan-b" stuff, but why do you hate holders though? Just because they have a different world view as you? Being a holder doesn't automatically mean you believe in Plan-B's stock to flow ratio.