Re: Abusing The Bitcointalk Trust System For Personal And Selfish Interests
To me it would be much more of an issue if legitimate complaints from bounty hunters were met with negative trust, but this doesn't seem the case (that I'm aware of).
It did happen. DB negged Mpamaegbu and some other posters in this thread. That's what my neg trust on BD is about. Some of those negs were revised to neutrals a few weeks later.
In this case, it just looks like pointless retaliation, that doesn't even show as DT either.
BD was briefly in DT2 courtesy of OgNasty. All those negs lit up as DT-red.
It doesn't indicate to me that their bounty hunters would get negged for raising criticisms, which to me would make the team high-risk for sure, especially if account were DT.
It absolutely does indicate exactly that.
Also witness the glorious stream of shitposters bumping this thread, scam ANN style.
Yeh I noticed, I hope you're not including me in this list either!
Are you a shitposter? If not then I'm probably not including you
This will be my last post unless others engage in this discussion further with me, to enlighten me. I can also understand bounty hunters coming to the support of their manager, it ironically tells me more that there are users that have received these bounty rewards, rather than the idea of being scammed. While it can be annoying, having an army of shitposters doesn't confirm someone is a scammer either, even if often enough this can be the case. This is why most bounties should be considered medium risk by default basically.
An army of shitposters magically finding their way to this thread, learning to speak English for the first time in their lives, etc indicates that the OP doesn't have 7 pages of real support. Those are either OP's sockpuppets or some telegram lemmings told to go post here. While I wouldn't red-tag for shitposting or even for soliciting shitposting - reported a bunch of them instead - it is a sign of dishonesty and of risk dealing with OP.