Any mentioning of capital gains tax or otherwise should be considered irrelevant as it is external to our ecosystem. There may be a point here, but it is outside our core economics design. This is simply out of our hands and there is nothing we can do about that. It pollutes the discussion in my opinion.
- it is just uncomfortable, but it clarifies the most important underlying question: that what is contaminated is the centralized layer of governance of DASH, which corrupts the project for its own particular interest. (To corrupt is to minimize or directly damage the potential of something out of interest outside of optimization or the benefit of the corrupted).
THAT is the drag on DASH and the reason its potential is not being expressed. Due to negligence, incapacity or both.
... unaware of the full effect it may have on our price or even the attack (troll) vector it creates for our adversaries. It looks bad, even if the intention is good.
- With defenders like those ... do you think adversaries are needed? Really ? 
By the way ... People should understand at once that, in crypto, DASH should ALWAYS be attacked more than the rest of the projects of its profile (and competition). It would be good to take it on at once and stop so much ridiculous persecution mania. ... Even though their return in Dash for running an MN is much lower, it would still be profitable in terms of USD.
- A reasonable objective would be good IN FIAT ... but it would even limit it at the top (in an IDEAL benefit of the project).PS: I'm aware that (yet) another block reward split is going to be proposed.