LoyceV, I think you do not quite understand what plagiarism is. First of all, plagiarism is the issuance of someone else's intellectual work under one's own name. Now answer a simple question: how could steklomoy arrogate to himself the rights of the Nexta channel by spreading the news about the award for the arrest of Lukashenka?
What you are now trying to call plagiarism is called the dissemination of information, and in connection with the recent events in Belarus - quite important information.
No, it's called plagiarism. The user didn't put any effort into attributing the
text and posted it as their own. The sentence doesn't even sound like it's coming
from Nexta, it is
about Nexta.
No and no. In the context of plagiarism, the text should be someone's unique thought. But this is not a thought that belongs to Ateo Breaking. This is Nexta's statement shared by Ateo Breaking and steklomoy on their own initiative. Learn to separate the wheat from the chaff.