Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: [WO] Counterstroke
by
OutOfMemory
on 03/12/2020, 19:37:57 UTC

—Protip:  Insulting someone’s thereby alleged sources of information without facts in evidence is a fallacious argument ad hominem.  Pointing out that admitted hallucinogenic drug users have disordered thinking, and have permanently compromised their own powers of judgment, is a valid argument ad hominem.

Define that.
And define "normal" (just as a lesson)