For example, in academic world, if you verbatim copy something without making clear distinction that's not your own words (and you do that by putting those sentences in quotation marks) it will be seen as plagiarism, even if you provide reference link at the end. So yeah, in those circles this would count as plagiarism.
В академическом мире частенько цифрами помечают ссылки на источники, откуда был взят текст. Недавно я переводил на русский язык несколько таких документов. Там обычно делается так, например:
....Some text
1....Some text
2....Some text
3And then at the end of the document there is a chapter called
references and there is an enumeration:
1 full link to the source
2 full link to the source
3 full link to the source
But here no one has done that, does not and will not do so. Also in the academic world, all pictures are also designated by links, but recently there was also such a controversy about plagiarism and it was found out that pictures without a link are not plagiarism. The rules say that if you take someone else's text, provide a link. Everything else does not apply to plagiarism, otherwise half of the forum could be banned for such violations.