To avoid further derailing LoyceV's thread...
It was pointed out to me by someone - not throwing that person under the bus unless they want to
- that OgNasty did some interesting changes in their trust list, resulting in this:
DireWolfM14 figured it out in ~20 minutes:
OgNasty came up with a feeble explanation that reeks of his typical weaselspeak:
Funny. It's like you think bitcointalk didn't exist before you joined it. I do love how much you care about whose feedback I trust to include in my network and that you think me including older feedback is somehow nefarious. I was harassed into removing older users from my network previously, so this move has actually been long overdue as all of the added users have highly valuable feedback left to members showing the length that some users have been trusted here. I really shouldn't justify this comment with a response, but I want you to know I saw that you have a problem with my trust additions even though you can't point to a single controversial feedback left by any of them, and I don't value your opinion whatsoever (I do highly trust nonnakip's opinion and the fact he doesn't respond to trust abuse by Vod/owlcatz/TMAN reflects not that he couldn't leave them a DT negative, but that he chooses not to even though he has earned that right). I also think that any lemming who would exclude me for adding users to my trust network should maybe give an example of a user that doesn't deserve to be included in my trust network...
My response in the next post.
It was pointed out to me by someone - not throwing that person under the bus unless they want to
- that OgNasty did some interesting changes in their trust list, resulting in this:Last update:
Right now:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18321;dt =>
Notice anything interesting? Merit for the first person to call it what it is. LoyceV can't participate for obvious reasons
Right now:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18321;dt =>
Notice anything interesting? Merit for the first person to call it what it is. LoyceV can't participate for obvious reasons
DireWolfM14 figured it out in ~20 minutes:
Trust score fortification (Self-Scratching) by DT1 member:
OgNasty came up with a feeble explanation that reeks of his typical weaselspeak:
Notice anything interesting? Merit for the first person to call it what it is. LoyceV can't participate for obvious reasons
Funny. It's like you think bitcointalk didn't exist before you joined it. I do love how much you care about whose feedback I trust to include in my network and that you think me including older feedback is somehow nefarious. I was harassed into removing older users from my network previously, so this move has actually been long overdue as all of the added users have highly valuable feedback left to members showing the length that some users have been trusted here. I really shouldn't justify this comment with a response, but I want you to know I saw that you have a problem with my trust additions even though you can't point to a single controversial feedback left by any of them, and I don't value your opinion whatsoever (I do highly trust nonnakip's opinion and the fact he doesn't respond to trust abuse by Vod/owlcatz/TMAN reflects not that he couldn't leave them a DT negative, but that he chooses not to even though he has earned that right). I also think that any lemming who would exclude me for adding users to my trust network should maybe give an example of a user that doesn't deserve to be included in my trust network...
My response in the next post.