Anyone in the business of taking the text of someone else and then jumbling up the words or changing some of the words, might be able to meet some kind of minimum threshold in terms of the number of words that were changed, but that still could be considered to be plagiarizing.. discretionary, like I mentioned.
What if a member just translates one article word for word? And presents the article as if in his own name
«In this article I would like to touch upon such a theme as» and adds many sources to make it look like he used all of them when writing.
I don't understand why others are protecting him.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5297144.0