This is modern journalism - she says "forensic journalism.... we could not rule him out"

So she found a broke guy in CA called, wait for it 'Satoshi Nakomoto'!  A guy with a passion for train models (evidence of er... 'techie stuff'), and decided it was her big break - then made the story fit.

The arrogance of journalists like this is stunning and if you have ever worked with them when they have already decided what the story is, and just need enough flimsy evidence to make their name by making a good enough case for it, then you will have seen how immoral and irresponsible they are.

Of course it isn't the right guy - any idiot could see that.  It's just despicable 'journalism'.

Her biggest mistake was thinking that it wouldn't catch up with her and the evidence would not be challenged just as forensically as her 'journalism' was.

Epic fail.

All typed with two spaces after a full stop - I always have done.  But I am not the 'father of Bitcoin' either.