The game of round one is over.
Answered all problems.
Not included in the plagiarism category.
In fact it was. Look deeper, he made copypaste of English phrase, verbatim and litteratim, not giving a reference link. But even this doesn't matter, he is spamming by copypasting content created by other authors and this is pinnacle.
Before you accuse other people of
plagiarism you must see something applied by the Bitcointalk forum owner.
Read carefully and understand the contents, the essence of the rules of Plagiarism.Common rule violations
These are the most common rule violations that newbies make. There are other rules than these.
- Plagiarism: If you copy some text from somewhere, then you should have a good reason for it, and you must link to the source. Doing otherwise is plagiarism. Changing a few words around doesn't matter. If we find that you plagiarized, then you absolutely will be permanently banned, even if we find it years after you did it.
What Ratimov did was not the fault and offense as you are accusing.
So, let me ask you again.Did Ratimov do what is stated in the above rules, if he did and put the source or changed some words,
Ratimov's answer does not qualify as a plagiarism violation.Now a second battle is at stake, I spend 2-4 hours reading, what do I see here the accusations against Ratimov.
In my assessment based on the rules made and said by the owner of the BitCointalk Forum.
Ratimov = Not classified as plagiarism.
If, as Ratimov wrote breaking the rules here, PM themmos, delete all the rules written above.