I did not go for the entire topic of this thread but just wanted to see what the case is by comparing with google translation. My findings are below for only with the beginning part
From the OP: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5297144.0
From accused topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5296174.0
Let's do some sampling...
Google translation
Google translation
The original source is of course
Let's say it's not plagiarism but is this something that the topic author (@Ratimov) can claim that is his own too?
No he can not.
But if we start reading the topic will anyone question at the first glance that the above samplings are not @Ratimov's own contents?
No. The way it has presented, no one will have any doubt that it's not @Ratimov's own contents unless we would see this topic from the OP
Question to those merit senders (DdmrDdmr (2), OgNasty (1), ETFbitcoin (1), mk4 (1), 20kevin20 (1), GazetaBitcoin (1)),
Did it look like the introduction (2 paragraphs) was entirely the author's (@Ratimov) own words when you sent the merits?
I am sure the answer will come Yes
Does it look like that it's just a lazy translation with some tweaks and you are feeling annoyed now?
The possible answer, Yes.
@Ratimov, you wanted to craft it in such a way that you wanted the credit of the article to be your own. This is not right either if this is not plagiarism.
If I would sent you merit then I would regret it after discovering this tactics.
From the OP: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5297144.0
From accused topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5296174.0
Let's do some sampling...
Quote
Пpaвитeльcтвa иcпoльзyют пaндeмию кaк пpeдлoг для oгpaничeния дocтyпa к инфopмaции. Oн тaкжe pacшиpяeт пoлнoмoчия пo мoнитopингy и внeдpeнию нoвыx тexнoлoгий, нaпpaвлeнныx нa oцифpoвкy, cбop и aнaлиз личныx дaнныx людeй бeз нaдлeжaщeй зaщиты oт злoyпoтpeблeний. Cтpaны ввoдят нoвыe пpaвилa Интepнeтa, чтoбы oгpaничить пoтoк инфopмaции чepeз нaциoнaльныe гpaницы.
Google translation
Quote from: https://prnt.sc/vy24wq
Governments use pandemic as a prerequisite to limit access to information. It also expands the power of monitoring and introducing new technologies aimed at digitizing, collecting and analyzing the personal data of evil people. Countries are introducing new Internet rules to limit the flow of information across national borders.
On the threadGovernments are using the pandemic as an excuse to restrict access to information. It also expands the powers to monitor and implement new technologies aimed at digitizing, collecting and analyzing personal data of people without adequate protection from abuse. Countries are introducing new Internet rules to restrict the flow of information across national borders.
Quote
для мнoгиx пoльзoвaтeлeй пpинципы бecпpeпятcтвeннoгo дocтyпa к инфopмaции и cвoбoднoгo выpaжeния мнeний имeют ocнoвoпoлaгaющee знaчeниe для paзвития гpaждaнcкoгo oбщecтвa и экoнoмичecкoгo пpoцвeтaния. Иcтopия вceмиpнoй пayтины - этo тaкжe иcтopия бopьбы зa ocнoвныe пpaвa чeлoвeкa, вoзмoжнocти для дocтижeния кoтopыx нeизмepимo выpocли c paзвитиeм тexнoлoгий.
Google translation
Quote from: https://prnt.sc/vy29hu
for many users, the principles of unrestricted access to information and free expressions of opinion are of fundamental importance for the enjoyment of enjoyment The history of the world of patina is also the history of the struggle for basic human rights;
On the threadfor many users, the principles of unhindered access to information and free expression are fundamental to the development of civil society and economic prosperity. The history of the world wide web is also the history of the struggle for basic human rights,
The original source is of course
Let's say it's not plagiarism but is this something that the topic author (@Ratimov) can claim that is his own too?
No he can not.
But if we start reading the topic will anyone question at the first glance that the above samplings are not @Ratimov's own contents?
No. The way it has presented, no one will have any doubt that it's not @Ratimov's own contents unless we would see this topic from the OP
Question to those merit senders (DdmrDdmr (2), OgNasty (1), ETFbitcoin (1), mk4 (1), 20kevin20 (1), GazetaBitcoin (1)),
Did it look like the introduction (2 paragraphs) was entirely the author's (@Ratimov) own words when you sent the merits?
I am sure the answer will come Yes
Does it look like that it's just a lazy translation with some tweaks and you are feeling annoyed now?
The possible answer, Yes.
@Ratimov, you wanted to craft it in such a way that you wanted the credit of the article to be your own. This is not right either if this is not plagiarism.
If I would sent you merit then I would regret it after discovering this tactics.