Look guys, she eliminated all of the other possibilities with forensic research, Okay? There were 8 Satoshi Nakamotos, this was the only one who worked on computers. So, without even taking evidence into consideration here, it's already the guy.

Step 2, she asked him something about bitcoin, and she's pretty confident that he knew they were talking about bitcoin, and he said he wasn't involved with it anymore. Okay? Do you understand? The evidence is backing the forensics.

Step 3, someone at Newsweek has vetted this process. Did you forensically find Nakamoto? You googled his name and eliminated the wrong ones by cross referencing their careers/hobbies with the word computer? Check. Did you get evidence to back the research? He claimed he had knowledge of the bitcoin corporation. Check.

What the hell else do you want? Propper journalistic guidelines were followed to a "T", and everything checked out. Your hero is a poor train nerd who lives with his mom. Deal with it.