I am not everyone I added fits both definitions.
They deserve both positive feed back and they are trustworthy as per the definition of the trust list rules.
I'm still not following how this hinders your ability to do business or use the trust system. You did everything right. End of story?
Even if you get excluded for this (unlikely) - so what? As long as your trust list works for you. Same with OgNasty. If his trust list makes him feel happy - good for him.
While I disagree with your "show and tell" here to include users just to prove something to us, I don't see it as equivalent of OgNasty including accounts that have been inactive for years and have no value to anyone other than to boost his own trust rating.
I'm quite surprised that you don't see the difference and insist that this is somehow an attack on anyone doing business. It's not. OgNasty can do business perfectly fine without being in DT. I'm not suggesting he should be labeled as scammer. I'm saying his judgement is not to be trusted. I have distrusted OgNasty years ago and I suggest anyone who can objectively look at his actions should do the same.
Call it an attack if you want but I consider it my responsibility to point things like that out... it's everyone's own decision what they want to do with it. Should they choose to exclude me instead that's perfectly fine too.