btw does anyone have an issue with the people i added today?
What you've done is fine, and does not compare to adding inactive and thieves to people you trust. But back on topic...
They want OG off and will keep chipping away. Eventually he will be gone.
OG does
good: OG / RCM flagged a user for scamming a couple pennies by pulling out of a deal.
OG does
bad: OG says he "lost" over 6,000 coins, but he
probably stole them.
In his case the bad far outweighs the good. His actions haven been self-centered for three decades.
Look you are making this too complicated.
1. There is undeniable independently verifiable evidence of scamming.
2. There is clear undeniable evidence they tried to scam.
3. There is strong independently verifiable evidence that demonstrates all the hallmarks of setting up a scam.
Warning is given the point it is has to be financially motivated and have strong evidence that can be analysed.
Where the DT is a mess is where anything you do can be used to take away your paid2post or damage conducting business on the subjective view of self elected DT. It doesnt have to be financially related in anyway. They will invent some mental gymnastics that say you drink lemonade or call them cunts that makes you a scammer or prone to scamming.
Tie it directly to the 3 points above all the trust systems largest holes and treating DT and meal ticket is over.
Merit sources cycling and back scratching themselves and each other will still place the same people on DT but the power of DT to cause damage is mostly over for good. They can still rely on scumbag campaign managers to say oh we only want people with lots of merits and who are on DT but free speech and free trade will be unhindered.
That's the best you can hope for now. Because theymos obviously simply didnt want to be responsible for hand picking DT and legally I can understand that. But make the threshold for damaging peoples trade and paid2post transparent and objective.
And really kick the shit out of abusers and make an example not cry to other DT to exclude Man up and kick them off at once.
No room for scammers no room for DT protection racket abuse and scamming with impunity or red tag trading.
It will be hard to prevent stuff like lfcbitcoin did aka giving people trust includes who help you block flags on your sponsor ? But there should be no flag without meeting the above 3 points anyway.
The type 1 flag aka pre emotive is always tricky but must have a direct financial aspect to it.
You dont have to worry as much who is on DT if they are not allowed to be entirely subjective and self serving.
There is no reasonable counter argument. If there is bring it now.
The entire trust system is rooted on self scratching and collusion. Crying about OGs self scratching here is bogus and laughable.
If these people he added had any kind of financially motivated wrongdoing in their histories that would be different.