I don't think anyone is saying that Ognasty can't be trusted
Dozens are saying he can't be trusted.
7 years ago he proudly announced he paid back 1% of a total loss of 6,500 btc. Now he's posting like it never happened, and even denying he ran that pirate passthrough ponzi.
Now you may say ok he lost more than anyone ever has, but that was many years ago.
Then he held 500 btc of forum funds, got paid 6btc a year to safeguard them, instead he treated them as if they were his own and stole value from them.
Fast forward to last month - a users pulls out after he finds out OG is the escrow. OG loses pennies (due to his own reputation) but still flags and leaves negative trust.
So NO - OgNasty cannot be trusted with large or small amounts. Anyone who says otherwise, or says I lie about it, has a political agenda.
Dozens are saying? I see the same bunch of people that have scamming, willing scam facilitating for pay or protecting scammers like you vod.
Now had you not have been found to be protecting 2 proven scammers before and not commenting at all when lauda used escrow funds to do the same thing you're accusing OG of and then adding them to you inclusions then perhaps you could be taken semi seriously by the objective reader here.
Well then you wouldn't appear to be a hypocritical scammers supporting coward that even admitted your dare not previously exclude lauda from the trust system or red tag them out of fear they may use the trust system to ruin your account.
You are all missing the point.
Whilst it remains possible for any member to ruin your account where there is zero evidence of scamming, attempting to scam or setting g up a scam or any financially motivated wrongdoing at all then the trust system is DANGEROUS..
Lol at this self scratching / back scratching being just another hole in the system.
It is largely irrelevant and totally and utterly the foundation of every members route and election on to DT
Everyone is self scratching and colluding it's part of the design. Merit cycling is the first round of self scratching and collusion that enables round 2 of the same on trust inclusions exclusions.
They are just making up illogical garbage that favours their position.
It's not about the person being financially trustworthy it's only about their opinions of others lol
Still they will trick you into defending your actions per the terms they claim are the rules. They dont want you to recognize the rules themselves and design is a dangerous design that placed them where they are now and has entrenched them with the power to crush free speech, crush everyone's ability to paid2post and trade freely on this whims and see they are paid at the highest rates on this forum for doing so.
Lol so by all means keep fall this trick. You dont need to appease these noob trash greedy sig spamming scammer supporters.
You need to lobby theymos to require a transparent objective standard for damaging a persons account.
They are either meet the 3 criteria above or they do not.
This will not fix the dumb self election process to DT and will not stop them milking the forum. However it will stop them crushing free speech and it will stop them damaging innocent persons accounts and threatening people , and it will stop the trust system being diluted with bogus warnings of financially motivated wrongdoing because someone said something they didnt like.
Dont bother defending yourselves on their bogus terms.
Those terms are entirely dangerous and counter productive because to operate correctly within the system without breaking the rules is dangerous anyway lol
Sadly most people are too stupid to understand the clear implications of the system anyway.
If so just take my word for it or try to debunk my points.
Just use another escrow says suchmoon? Oh who's would you reccomend?