and you have admitted to my only problem with the attack on og you can doctor the evidence.
This thread isn't even based on my data:
Quote
edit: to be clear this attack on this thread done against Og is done with evidence that may or may not have been doctored.
If that would be the case, don't you think OgNasty would have pointed that out already?Quote
Only theymos can refute or say the info is true.
For current data, I gave a few possibilities to verify it. If you want to verify what happened for instance a year ago, I don't know theymos if still has snapshots of the weekly Trust data dumps. I know the forum doesn't store any records on editing posts within the first 10 minutes, so clearly not everything is preserved forever.btw the only person that verifies loyce list is theymos.
I'd be honored if theymos takes the time to verify my Trust list viewer, but I don't think he does.Quote
loyce could be suspect over the self scratch list
theymos could be suspect over the self scratch list.
I'm not sure what this means/implies.theymos could be suspect over the self scratch list.
Quote
C) In general bitcointalk has helped a lot of people and I don’t want to attack it or its members
Agreed. I've suggested a few times that OgNasty and Vod should just get a beer together, and find common ground. Or ignore each other.it does appear he did take some forked coins.
OgNasty never took Forkcoins without theymos' permission:In the case of the treasury agreement: all forkcoins were always forum property from the beginning. I voluntarily gifted OgNasty the non-major forkcoins, since dealing with them would be more trouble than they're worth. The three forkcoins transferred to me were ones I specified. Airdrops are different. I don't think that OgNasty should've collected airdrops via forum BTC, but collecting and keeping airdrops was not prohibited by the agreement, and the forum has no agreement-wise claim on those coins.