@BitcoinFX
you do realize that whether the filename is "satoshinakamoto.asc" or "satoshi_nakomoto.asc" makes precisely zero difference to if the key works or not?
you're _literally_ arguing about "what color to paint the bikeshed" here
@Carlton Banks
Of course I do.
You do realize that satoshi placed
his PGP key at bitcoin.org and named it Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc and
not satoshinakamoto.asc .
So currently ...
-
http://www.bitcoin.org/satoshinakamoto.asc (the historically
incorrect link will download the key)
whilst
-
http://www.bitcoin.org/Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc (this historically
correct link will not download the key)
...
When we have the likes of CSW merging some historical facts with total fiction in blog posts like this one, ...
- hxxps://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/satoshi-never-posted-on-bitcointalk/
whilst persisting on making claims to the satoshi identity in a court of law and yet without presenting any valid cryptographically assured proof to date whatsoever, then these historical artifacts are very relevant and important, if not critical to the outcome.
So no, I'm not literally arguing
"about "what color to paint the bikeshed" here" ... am I.
