Why is this topic going on for several days and no one can remember a good rule that also holds in this forum?
23. When deciding if a user has broken the rules, the staff have the right to follow their interpretation of the rules.[e]
Ratimov, you have passed to the next step. Having appeared in the Russian locale, you also fought for your reputation. I think it only makes you stronger. Some people cannot calm down until they ruin the lives of others. They spend time searching to avenge their mistakes. The OP wrote that you once left him a red tag. Yes, people are vindictive, and more often than not they are not inclined to blame themselves for their mistakes.
A lot of advice has been said, and as always, "initiative is punishable", you have concluded, and I think that everything will soon settle down.
Well, I again urge everyone to calm down and remember the good rule number 23.
lovesmayfamilis, I am amazed at what a two-faced whore you are. In the exact same situation, you say something completely different, I can only explain this by the fact that
bitcoinst apparently didn't fuck you to protect him.
Since you are so fond of quoting the rules, I will also quote something.
User
bitcoinst from Russian local section.
There are rules written in black and white that say:Messages must be original. "Stuffing" the number of messages made by the copy-paste principle from another resource is unacceptable. Such messages fall under the first paragraph of the rules.
Unfortunately, in the English section, I did not find amendments to such rules.
This is a very common occurrence, which clearly indicates the cunning of those who write such posts. The Internet is open, anyone can find any information on the web, but this should not be the rule for creating messages in subscription companies.
We all understand the subtext with which such messages are created.
If this is taken for messages of low quality, in this case, informing the moderators will be absolutely correct. ]bitcoinst[/url] a merit source? No. This explains the difference between lovesmayfamilis's attitudes towards him and Ratimov.