⭐ Merited by johhnyUA (1)
Still waiting for links to knowledgeable posts Ratimov has made which aren't copy paste. Why does no one reply?
So, the unbanned copypasteress, who subsequently made a career of getting small copypasters banned, now steps up to protect the major active career plagiarist who is systematically spamming this forum with completely ripped-off posts. I expected that—I saw it coming—though of course, I could not accuse someone of something that she had not yet done.
Much of this discussion exemplifies a phenomenon that Lauda privately called “the enablers”. Some enablers are cowards: They will do the right thing when convenient, but they will never criticize or oppose popular people—let alone those with DT inclusions. Of those who defend Ratimov on this thread, how many act from peer pressure?
Others run a common sort of reputational long con on this forum: They build reputation playing police against smaller wrongdoing, then exploit that position to protect bigger wrongdoing. If there is no honour among thieves, why not show virtue prosecuting pickpockets so as to promote highway robbery?
Yes, people are vindictive, and more often than not they are not inclined to blame themselves for their mistakes.
You hypocrite! Ratimov is the one hereby not inclined to blame himself for his own wrongdoing, which is assuredly not a mistake.
Lauda бы назвала тебя хитрой. I am not so gentle: I will call you хитровыебанной.
(I would ask Ratimov to translate, but he cannot: He is a tool, and my tricks are superior to his tools. O Google Translate, я тебя тыкал!)
Whereas I, who have hereby condemned Ratimov, assuredly have never had any self-interested grudge against him. Indeed, I had nothing at all against him—before a few weeks ago, when I independently discovered something dirty in the Russian forum; you will be miserable when I disclose that publicly. And hereby, I act on the evidence.
I condemn plagiarism. Ratimov is a systematic, active, remorseless plagiarist who blames only others for his own wrongdoing. Therefore, I condemn Ratimov.
Quote from: nullius
Unlike copyright law violations, plagiarism is truly the theft of ideas. It is singularly the most reprehensible wrong that can be committed within the realm of the intellect; and it is inherently fraudulent, an intellectual scam by definition.
If they themselves have punished others for plagiarism that is different.
I am curious to see what lovesmayfamilis has to say about this. (Among other things in the Russian forum.)Actually, I wasn’t really curious. Just call me cynical.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5525/55250929.html
“Ратимов” = Ratimov
Ратимов ты не просто Герой. Ты уже суперГерой
да еще и всевидящий сорс.
Мои поздравления!!!
lovesmayfamilis’ bad-faith rules-lawyering should get short shrift!
lovesmayfamilis, I am amazed at what a two-faced whore you are. In the exact same situation, you say something completely different, I can only explain this by the fact that bitcoinst apparently didn't fuck you to protect him.
Since you are so fond of quoting the rules, I will also quote something.
Since you are so fond of quoting the rules, I will also quote something.
User bitcoinst from Russian local section. There are rules written in black and white that say:
This is a very common occurrence, which clearly indicates the cunning of those who write such posts. The Internet is open, anyone can find any information on the web, but this should not be the rule for creating messages in subscription companies.
We all understand the subtext with which such messages are created. If this is taken for messages of low quality, in this case, informing the moderators will be absolutely correct.
Quote
Messages must be original. "Stuffing" the number of messages made by the copy-paste principle from another resource is unacceptable. Such messages fall under the first paragraph of the rules.
Unfortunately, in the English section, I did not find amendments to such rules. This is a very common occurrence, which clearly indicates the cunning of those who write such posts. The Internet is open, anyone can find any information on the web, but this should not be the rule for creating messages in subscription companies.
We all understand the subtext with which such messages are created. If this is taken for messages of low quality, in this case, informing the moderators will be absolutely correct.
Tsk, tsk. Dear anonymous “clown troll”, you did such a good job reporting this. Please, let us keep our language suitable to the cultural level of the audience!
With due apologies to the gentleman who just started cursing at me under his breath. I realized long ago that this forum is not a place for gentlemen.