But usually people do not check if the feedback is true, and if no one leaves him "Neutral feedback" then Ratimov will think that He got away with everything and will continue to leave false feedback. I'm sure you agree with me, besides Ratimov didn't even bother to edit the article.
What you're suggesting is retaliatory feedback for a
neutral, which is basically Bitcointalk's equivalent of throwing sand at your playdate because she said something you don't like. So no, I don't agree with you there. You can try creating a new thread in Reputation so that we can stop derailing this one, and recommend excluding Ratimov from trust lists, but I don't see that getting much support on the basis of one neutral rating.