Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Basic IQ test on Satoshi's identity
by
cAPSLOCK
on 08/03/2014, 05:43:10 UTC
All those people who vote "no" and have been posting in the recent threads about whether that Japanese guy in CA is the real Satoshi, took the blue pill (i.e. you are losing your sanity).

Those who vote "yes" are just dumb.


Just a few observations.

1.  You spend a great deal of time and energy belittling others especially in ways that are implicitly braggadocios.  Most of the time you attack people intelligence or masculinity.  I find it pathetic and very telling.

2.  Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto allegedly used an outdated version of his legal name when he published the paper and in his early communications.  He may have found this light pseudo anonymity enough when he was musing about the creation of bitcoin.

3.  DPSN may have found traction in the growing interest in who he was and obvious confusion as to his possible identities as an advantage of greater anonymity than he had counted on having when he used his birth name in the beginning.  Perhaps he then decided along the way to bail as bitcoin grew at a pace and to a size he had not expected (there is some evidence SN thought bitcoin was growing too fast).

4.  Your "logic" is based both in full hindsight as well as rooted in your own values (extreme anonymity an obvious one).  This leads you to a possible error in thought.

It could simply be, that if Dorian is THE Satoshi that he didn't feel an overly strong need to be completely anonymous until his creation began to have minor success, and then as it went from minor to major he took advantage of the fact no one had put two and two together and faded into the shadows.

I imagine he might have even planned a strategy to deal with this inevitable day.

I personally do not know if DPSN is SN.

I know your "logic" is full of shit though.