~~SNIP~~
Aside from that, you know what Tash or BadDecker, there are articles that says about evidences and proofs that gravity doesn't exist, or earth is flat, or bigfoot sightings in Washington, and many more. Maybe you read that and tell us they are indeed real, and rephrase their sentence and post it in this forum
Another thing, that tash post is really similar to how baddecker post, without that
, and I am pretty convinced that they only have one operator.As long as you keep saying stuff like, "gravity doesn't exist, or earth is flat, or bigfoot sightings in Washington, and many more," who is going to believe you in anything. Besides, you and franky1 are so similar in some of the things you post, that you must be one joker with several accounts.
Nice interpretation of my sentence
, that is indeed a remarkable comprehension right there. You nitpicked that words, and not the idea nor the whole sentence in it. I guess that's what you've been doing in those researches you've sent that I've debunked last time. Nitpicking words that will satisfy your appetite, a very conspiracy theorist characteristics. Another thing "who is going to believe you in anything", is that why many other accounts in this forum disagree with what you've been saying? The conspiracies, the unrefined articles, the lies (even pointed out by franky1 in his previous replies), I think I get it
I was simply following your lead, since you said things about me in the ways you described that I did about you. I thought that it must be some kind of game you were playing, and that calling my name out meant that you were inviting me to play.
It doesn't matter if anybody believes me or not. Since people often aren't interested in the facts, why would they be interested in getting the facts from me? But there are some who get the facts, and they understand the facts I present. Are you going to find the facts? Or will you keep on listening to hot-air franky1?