I think my following words are being misunderstood so I will rephrase them just for the clarification:
I know it isn't considered wise to leave retaliatory feedback but I think you deserve at least neutral feedback for coming up with this shit and wasting my time.
"I know it isn't considered wise to leave retaliatory feedback
so I won't be leaving one but I think you deserve at least neutral feedback for coming up with this shit and wasting my time. "
I only consider negative for negative feedback as the retaliatory one. So me leaving you (@Timelord2067) neutral trust for your negative feedback wasn't retaliatory at all. It was the feedback on your poor judgement on detecting alts which eventually turned out to be true because you changed your feedback from 'red' to 'neutral' in my case and soon you gonna remove it completely when blackjack.fun will fail to provide any proof (provided if you are rational at all).
And as far as adding you to my distrust list is concerned, 'Trust List' is a
private list of every member. Every member has complete right to add whoever he thinks is good in giving trustworthy feedback or bad when it comes to leaving feedback. Me adding you to my distrust list has no direct impact on forum reputation so there is nothing for you to complain about. And you ranting about it and further giving me red trust does nothing but further justify why I added you to my distrust list.