Re: Abortion is the leading cause of death during the pandemic, killing 37 million
Embryos are not babies, having said that @BADecker don't you think it's appropriate for women to abort some babies?
Don't you think the world at large is over populated?
Please I need constructive criticism, that's if you want to criticize. don't come from the religious field.
What's your take?
Don't you think the world at large is over populated?
Please I need constructive criticism, that's if you want to criticize. don't come from the religious field.
What's your take?
A child is not an adult. So what? You can tell by the chromosomes that they are all stages in a life of a human being. Kill a human at any stage of his life, and it is still murder.
World population is presently not near being a problem.
Since you are coming from the religious field with your questions, how can I answer them without the religious field? Only if you know for an absolute fact that what you say is absolute truth... only then might it start to deviate from the field of religion.
I don't take without an offer being made first.
May I intervene with this, but in which sentence does @Nelkell007 put religious field in this?
So we can see that anything that a person does in his life is part of his religion. why? Because whatever he does is what he follows devotedly in his life.
Another things:
1. Child has life, teens have life, an adult has life, but zygote and embryo don't. The thing about is, if you're referring to chromosomes as your main argument, then we shouldn't masturbate cause we will cause sperm and egg to die, which is part of "STAGE OF LIFE". Many other aspects should be considered in considering if a thing is already a life form or not.
Even though many other things are considered, they are simply stage-of-life considerations. They are not existence of life considerations.
The idea of life is not the question. People are buried or cremated all over the place. Hopefully they are already dead when this is done to them. The question has to do with murdering them... same as murdering them at ANY stage of life.
2. World Population is really problematic right now, increasing at a rate of 1.05% per year or 80 + million annually in the whole world, And as we all know that in order to survive, we must take resources as a source of nutrition, shelter, and clothings. If we dig deeper, it doesn't end there as the hierarchy of social status within each country is correlated to the consumption of resources.
World population is not a problem at all. The problem is some people trying to make population into a problem.
So far, all of the people in the world could be packed into one cubic mile. But, they would easily fit into two.
There is no end to the amount of water available. Graphene can filter salt water into fresh water.
Vertical farming can fix any agriculture problem we might run into for the next thousand years.
About 38% of the land in the USA is owned by government. It has few inhabitants on it... mostly government workers. Bangladesh might have many more people, but Siberia is almost uninhabited. And there is "seasteading."
No population problem exist. But if somebody really likes the idea of murder, how can he make a judgment that someone else should die? He should start by eliminating himself.