....
Well we can't blame him for that I'm not quite sure if it was paid but I think he based about the no license I've seen that yolodice too got a 3 star for not having a license too but anyways that website for me is great since it doesn't hide the pros and cons.
How do you know that the revised rating was due to the license? I didn't see anyone raising that issue when the "5 stars" was first posted. I also don't know if CryptoFairly thought Betfury was licensed at first and changed it later on.
All review sites that are reputable to me shows pros and cons too.
I think this might be the case, CryptoFairly might not notice that betfury doesn't have a license and revised it into 3 stars. All of the unlicensed casinos are placed in 3 stars and under. Obviously, CryptoFairly is making license a big factor in their rating and we couldn't do about it because it is their rating.