Valid.
There is still a chance. But slightest chance won't make a player win especially in this aspect, which is sport. But for sure they will gain from doing so, more likely money purposes. If we will base on their statistics and capabilities, the winner would be obvious in a single glance. Disregarding the bias. In Sports, there are factors which will make an individual to be victorious and that I think is the advantage of Floyd in this match up. So even if it is valid to say that there is a chance for Paul, that chance would be close to zero, making it to not matter at all. Luck I think would help Paul with this thing but as I've said, I guess winning over the other player is not their aim in this mismatch, if I would say, because the common denominator why this match up was made in the first place is popularity.
Yup! Even though we all don't want to get biased, we tend to do because the outcome of this would be pretty obvious. Here are my own reason why Floyd will win whatever happens:
1) It was an only an
exhibition. We can presume that the whole fight is staged. Just what like happened in Mayweather vs Nasukawa fight (but hoping it wouldn't be too obvious this time).
2) It's all about money. and lastly,
3) Floyd will not definitely let his record get tarnished by an amateur boxer/Youtube vlogger

.
Thus, it is safe to say that Paul got zero chance of winning. He can landed punch and make the fight a little but spicy but in the end it doesn't really matter. Floyd will prevail and that's the hard truth.