he confirmed telling "I am no longer involved in that and I cannot discuss it" so she didnt lie here, also this means that he knew about what she was talking about, this guy is not dumb....
Where did he confirm that? And who says he was talking about Bitcoin?
see in this Video he said " i ahve nothing with developing, I was just an eginneer doing something else"
http://youtu.be/-oRq7e8GMII so he knew abou the developing part.
What do you mean he knew about the developing part? He gets accused of being the Bitcoin developer by this reporter, and he simply responds with ''I have nothing to do with Bitcoin, nothing to do with developing''. There's nothing weird or strange about this part, he is simply responding to what people stated about what he was doing.
but the funnier thing is that here he said : " I have nothing to do with Bitcoin, I never worked for the company...." http://youtu.be/kk2Lys4CuDU?t=48s so now Bitcoin is a company... this guy is just trying to hide something..
Now you're just making stuff up. You're trying too hard to see patterns here and you're grasping at everything to make it seem like it is him or that he is hiding something. This is called confirmation bias. Let it go man. Compare his writings with the real Satoshi and it's clear as day it's not him. End of story.