I never understood why people gets upset when an exchange asks your ID.
Asking for an ID is perfectly fine.
Accepting your funds without an ID and then asking for an ID, after you deposited, to let you withdraw... is a completely different matter.
Its not wrong if you had full month notice to withdraw it without being verified and aside if you somehow missed to see it, they would also allow to get funds back without i.d. to your bank account.
That change was not over night like you lohoris want to show. Users had a month period. And even after that somebody still would not want to submit the id, bitstamp would transfer the funds to bank account and closed user account.why? Because that is a policy for termination in their terms and if user stop to acknowledge (new) policy or terms. Do you suggest that bitstamp should make exception to one and only member on this forum who bitch and moan because he did not visited bitstamp for a month and does not read tos?
I really dont see a problem....only trolls and baseless bashing.