So according to your vision, BTC is good because it goes up.
I buy BTC because it has been going up for more than 10 years, and if I buy today in a few years I will get rich.
Is this the reason that BTC makes better than other currencies?
I'm not talking about Dash, or if he has failed with his nodes, or if he will fly to the stars tomorrow.
I'm talking about you saying that if I buy Dash, I finance the master node holders. But I can freely buy as much Dash as I want for others to finance me hoping to make a profit in the future.
Don't BTC holders expect to make a profit on their investment. Isn't it a fad that BTC rises in a few months more than in three years?
Is 6X growth in 9 months organic for you?
I am a BTC holder, and I ask myself questions every day about what makes me keep BTC in the long term, and the only answer I have is to be able to sell it to a more expensive one every day.
Can this last forever?
a greeting
BTC is (officially) an attempt to standardize global savings and compete with FOFOA's famous FreeGold that has been working perfectly since the mid-70s. But BTC is a fiat catalyst, nothing more: Real Wealth is already synthesized at the molecular and molecular level. indestructible ... for what it is insurmountable ... and less for a technological system, which is fragile by definition (not its approach, but its own structure, composition or format) .The volatility of BTC (actually, another system of drainage such as the one that the DAO hijackers want to carry out for particular benefit in DASH) limits it, moreover, as a Global Savings Standard and a cumulative and progressive Store of balue, but at least it is particularly usable while the party is still on, because the BTC leaks are, at the very least, interactive and decentralized. That's why BTC works ... because you can run that fiat catalyst at your convenience, whether you're a wall street millionaire shark or a humble bartender in Berlin. As a fiat catalyst, it works.
The underlying problem of DASH is that it does not respect the wealth that is devoted to its structure (and by extension, the individual ownership of that wealth). It is not a store of value because it is emptied for the benefit of a centralized elite. It is too gross a scam as the retards who wanted to kidnap her ... and have killed her. A pity, because Duffield's self-financing perfectly matched the speculatibo capital movements on it ... but hey, the fact is that it is already too late to rethink that, possibly.