You misunderstood me. Using coinjoin for BTC, LTC BCH, etc requires trust as you need to send your coins to a 3rd party mixer and hope they send them back. Dash's coinjoin is decentralized and trustless.
That's a service feature, not a store of value.
Thanks for the obvious I guess... And?
Why is dash Nº 38 in ranking now ?
I don't know... maybe it's the powerful effect of your constant pushing of your half-baked theories and FUDing. Maybe you hypnotized/brainwashed the silent masses to dump their DASH as quickly as possible and others not to buy because you said it's not a good store of value.
I say silent masses because to date I've only noted one, perhaps 2 who seem to parrot your spiel (not counting the band of trolls). However, the evidence is that one of these actually sold his masternodes before your rants and the other was never really invested in the first place so perhaps they just seek comfort that their investment decisions were sound.
It's such a terrible thing that DOGE is higher in marketcap? Perhaps you should seek to understand the niche DOGE seems to occupy and why it's been relatively successful thus far.
And here's a curious thing... DOGE is merge mined with LTC, isn't it? That means all those miners mining for LTC get DOGE for free doesn't it? Does this mean based on your theories that DOGE should be worth nothing? It's mined at 0% difficulty, no?
Why do we have to live with the demented Spork 21 protocol when the Dash supply could be deployed much more aggressively against other mined coins ?
I assume you are referring to the gradual shift in reward distribution from 50/50 between miners/masternodes to 40/60 over the next 5 years. I believe, but may be mistaken, that spork21 was more to do with enforcing masternodes run a minimum version of 0.16 and would get banned otherwise.
The real issue with the reward change is the perception that masternodes were able to vote themselves better rewards. And for what? The reward increase after 5 years from now will amount to a masternode getting roughly 0.1 DASH extra and the miner getting roughly 0.1 DASH less per block. For the individual masternode owner this is about 0.3 extra DASH per month, about 3.5 extra DASH per year 5 years from now. Right now the difference is much much less. The actual change is currently negligible, but the problem of conflict of interest and bad perception is real. The only thing that somewhat alleviates this perception is the quickness in which the miners upgraded to seemingly indicate their acceptance of it. After all, not sure an individual miner in a pool would notice much of a difference either.