i disagree with you. as there were no pools after launch, difficulty went up quickly fast... nobody had the chance to instamine the coin as ALL had wallet mining only. btw if u have a background in development u would know that u can by no means create this coins implementation in two weeks.. I am a very small fish but i mined from the beginning and i am good to go (even got some blocks solo). i am still mining now at 1gh. this coin sets itself apart from the standard copyclone in the forum by far. now there are some people who are completely frustrated and i can understand that because they are angry at the launch. understandable. but criticizing the development of the coin and "wait til an attack happens and the incompetent developer" etc., sentences like this, its just funny man. the fact that u are posting here proves that u have some reason to give hvc attention. anyway good luck to u. to each his own, i endorse that!!
What? Have you seen the code? It's sloppy as hell. The labels don't make sense. There's few notes/comments in the code itself. The coin set itself apart before it launched as a coin with some good ideas. The implementation and launch failed miserably. That's why the original thread had to be locked.
1. How could the difficulty level have increased so quickly if nobody was mining? That makes no sense. People were indeed mining. The developers and his buddies were mining along with a few people who had 1000 cpus or 500 cpus. They got the early coins. Mining was going on for 12 hours before the first pool was up with all the smaller users getting no blocks. Only those with 50+ CPUs got blocks before 1gh was up.
2. 18 hours after launch, still no pool.
2. something like 8% of the total was pre-mined.
3. You are a complete fool if you don't believe that there are a lot of ways to exploit this coin. Oh, that's right. Your programming skills are probably as poor as your grammar. I'm out of this thread. This shit is amateur hour.