04 March 2014. Hmm. Seems to me that if I were trying really hard to convince the world that I was not some crazy crypto-anarchist, I would have routinely participated in local government throughout the years. I might also write letters to city gov in crappy, broken english so that people say "yeah, defo not Satoshi." The man worked for the U.S. Gov for many years in top-security-clearance research positions, likely had to write many reports, the chance that he actually writes like a 7th grader is slim to none.
I would also intentionally mispronounce Bitcoin as "Bitcom" in an AP interview. "Look, see, he mispronounced Bitcoin. Since it is impossible to do that intentionally unless you have a Doctorate degree in acting and theatre, he must not be Satoshi, QED."
For the record I'm not saying he's Satoshi as there is not enough proof; nor am I saying he's not Satoshi. I love how people tend to gravitate towards "He's Satoshi!1" or "He's not Satoshi!1" when there is really not definitive evidence to support either conclusion. Learn to get comfortable with gray areas! Sometimes there is not a QED and you have to be patient ;-)