If the shoe fits, wear it, lowlife
your arguments lack cohesion, im pretty sure the shoe only fits in your blinkered little world. This is you - "boo hoo Ive got a shit pc and havent been able to make million off mining cryptocurrency".
Actually, it's more like you're the one crying saying "boo hoo ... you were mislead and some of you were defrauded but what's wrong with that? As long as I profit, fuck the ones who were misled"
who has been mislead? nobody at all, I don't have a huge setup but at the same time i'm not naive enough to think that you can get something out of absolutely nothing. Please carry on inbreeding in your family as it's clearly adding to your intellect, lol.
So if someone invests in something being told "it is fully decentralized and distributed" but then find out it's one man in his mom's basement doing all the work, it doesn't constitute fraud? You may be just some chump low-grade miner but there are people who invested money and lost because the developers flat out lied about how the launch would go and then depended on the community to fix what he could not do on his own while he got paid 100% of the money and got to make sure the mining was distributed disproportionately. That's immoral regardless what excuse you make up for it. Can't really blame you though, I blame your yellow parents.
haha, this chump of a low grade miner also took part in the IPO and now that others have lacked foresight has taken upon himself to get even more HVC. regardless of how smooth or unsmooth the launch was/is, this coin is unique. as soon as the rest of the pools are up then distribution wont be an issue and regardless of that there is a pool where even the little guy can get his HVC. I believe any immorality here is purely because of issues rather than deception on the part of the devs, why would they lie? coupled with this if you are so aggrieved with this coin/launch then why are you even bothering to comment?
I comment because people like you are saying things like "this coin is so unique despite all the failures". You have an interest only in making sure people don't see the coin for what it is, a failure. It is not "distributed" or "decentralized". That's just misleading. Call it whatever you want, but the words decentralized and distributed do not represent this coin in the least bit. You can make love to the coin all you want, but at the end of the day, people will read this and make up their own decision. Reading through the thread, one can clearly see how centralized and undistributed this launch was. That's not going to change. There's no way to reverse that regardless of how confident you feel that voted block rewarding is going to propel your coin upwards.
To anyone reading this, a good 15% of this coin was already gone before any pools were up. The "decentralized" theme is a myth. Please do your own research by reading earlier pages and seeing exactly how the launch went.